Back to Survey Portal
ID EN
LP3M UNISSULA Quality Assurance Questionnaire

UNISSULA Governance Satisfaction Survey

Code: DOC-TATAKELOLA-2025 • Academic Year 2025/2026

Respondent Identity & Role
The respondent group is set by the survey target.
Select a faculty first to see its study programs.
Quality Assessment Indicators
Section 1: Credibility
No Statement Answer Options
1 Very Poor 2 Poor 3 Fair 4 Good 5 Very Good
1. The leadership selection process at UNISSULA follows established procedures
2. The leadership selection process at UNISSULA involves the academic community and relevant stakeholders
3. Leaders are able to guide others to consistently uphold values, norms, ethics, and culture
4. Leaders have authority and are able to influence their subordinates
5. Leaders always make quick and sound decisions
6. The leadership has a broad and visionary perspective
Section 2: Transparent
No Statement Answer Options
1 Very Poor 2 Poor 3 Fair 4 Good 5 Very Good
1. Policy-making at UNISSULA involves internal stakeholders and is conducted transparently
2. UNISSULA’s governance system is implemented in accordance with clear procedures
3. The work program was communicated to all stakeholders
4. The results of the work are published for relevant stakeholders
Section 3: Responsibility
No Statement Answer Options
1 Very Poor 2 Poor 3 Fair 4 Good 5 Very Good
1. UNISSULA has a clear division of roles, functions, and authority
2. UNISSULA has clear individual job descriptions
3. UNISSULA has clear standard operating procedures
Section 4: Accountability
No Statement Answer Options
1 Very Poor 2 Poor 3 Fair 4 Good 5 Very Good
1. UNISSULA has clear and measurable performance indicators
2. UNISSULA has a structured control mechanism through its internal quality assurance system
3. UNISSULA has a mechanism for accountability in the implementation of activities
4. UNISSULA has a tiered and periodic performance accountability report
Section 5: Fairness
No Statement Answer Options
1 Very Poor 2 Poor 3 Fair 4 Good 5 Very Good
1. Appointments of administrative officials at UNISSULA are based on competence and track record
2. UNISSULA implements its compensation and incentive policies appropriately
3. UNISSULA consistently enforces its rules regarding rewards and punishments